LEGO Star Wars 2025 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!!!

[BacktoBricks]

1 hour ago, Samppu said:

1. Me too, though it crossed my mind that a simple answer might be availability in production. Even fairly common pieces might not be in production every year, even if the mold still existed? Just a guess, but I know this sometimes explains weird design choices, as it was mentioned by a designer in some interview years ago that they share the same problems as kids when building: they have to make do with what is available, unlike us adults who can in principle just order whatever stuff we possibly need from Bricklink.

That's a good point and I know it does apply sometimes (I believe Sally in the Nightmare before Christmas set uses a different hairpiece to the CMF Sally according to designers because of such an issue), but the hairpiece used on the old Young Boba minifigures is still in production in black as it is currently used for Severus Snape, Winter Soldier and Morro in sets this year as well as a Friends minidoll, a Creator Town minifigure and a Speed Champions minifigure in sets released last year. In other words, it's being used for Harry Potter, Marvel, Ninjago, Friends, Creator and Speed Champions so its availability doesn't seem to be an issue. In fact, I don't believe the hairpiece in black has been out of production for a single year since it was introduced in 2010.

Edited March 21 by BacktoBricks

[CallumPears]

3 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

What's weird to me is dark red hips would have been enough there, and lego makes swimsuit figures without dual molded legs fairly frequently. It is really odd dual-molding priority, feels like they were trying to avoid any possible backlash

Of all the figures to give dual-moulding she absolutely should've been the lowest-priority (especially when they were too cheap to put the dual-moulded C-3PO in the same set, though tbh I don't like that figure anyway since they used matte grey instead of silver for god only knows what reason), but they could've made her at least somewhat accurate with a light nougat triangle printed on the side of each leg to show a split in the fabric.

As for backlash, it really seems like the only people who actually care are the higher-ups who only care themselves because they *think* that the average consumer would care (same goes for the name of Slave I, etc.). 

3 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

the only 10 people who know what the UT-AT is called read it in the visual dictionary back in 2009 or so.

Even there it was mislabelled as the SPHA. 

Edited March 22 by CallumPears

[Brickwraith]

13 hours ago, Meaf said:

That's a good point, but I do think we have to consider the length of time between the cancellation of the original UT-AT and the new one we're getting now. The original one was planned to release something like ten years ago, whereas we're only five years out from the remade Bounty Hunter Pursuit. Not saying it's impossible by any means, but if they were willing to cancel it five years ago, I'm not sure why they'd want to make it now when there are even fewer playsets on shelves to begin with. 

Edit: Forgot to say this but also in the case of the UT-AT, it's very obvious what changed in the market to make Lego release one, that of course being clone mania. Afaik Episode II hasn't really had any kind of surge in popularity like that.

The AT-AT pilot helmet was cancelled two years ago and just released. We have so little info on cancelled sets I don't think we can really make any definitive statements on how long it takes a cancelled set to be reconsidered

[Mandalorianknight]

3 hours ago, CallumPears said:

Of all the figures to give dual-moulding she absolutely should've been the lowest-priority (especially when they were too cheap to put the dual-moulded C-3PO in the same set, though tbh I don't like that figure anyway since they used matte grey instead of silver for god only knows what reason), but they could've made her at least somewhat accurate with a light nougat triangle printed on the side of each leg to show a split in the fabric.

As for backlash, it really seems like the only people who actually care are the higher-ups who only care themselves because they *think* that the average consumer would care (same goes for the name of Slave I, etc.). 

Even there it was mislabelled as the SPHA. 

Oh man not the light printing on a dark color, it'd just look like her skirt had white triangles painted on them.

Yeah exactly nobody's actually hurt by a more accurate slave leia.

How in San Hill do I know the name of that vehicle.... I looked it up and it's only ever been in the 5 seconds of the movie, a panel or two in the disney theme park comic, and had it's ruins mentioned in Tarkin. (Presumably I know it from that last one, I guess, since it wasn't named in the film and I never read the comic. For the sake of completion, in Legends it could be seen in a Battlefront 2 (2005) cutscene and it's wreckage was present in TFU). Which really puts into perspective how obscure this thing is- usually the "twelve seconds in the background of a movie" vehicles or characters show up more frequently or get fleshed out in comics, games, tv shows, etc, but the UT-AT's only managed to get two flashback cameos by virtue of being present in the scene where Ki-Adi Mundi dies, and two cameos as smoldering wreckage. I'd honestly put this as a justifier-level set in terms of cost/obscurity, though I think the justifier still edges it out in terms of how baffling a decision it is because as obscure as the UT-AT is, we at least know WHY it was chosen. I can't imagine lego thought Cad would carry a $170 set alone.

1 hour ago, Brickwraith said:

The AT-AT pilot helmet was cancelled two years ago and just released. We have so little info on cancelled sets I don't think we can really make any definitive statements on how long it takes a cancelled set to be reconsidered

I agree with your wider point but if I was the guy who designed that helmet and it got cancelled I'd be walking in to the exec's office every day to plead it's case, that's the best helmet by a mile and I can't imagine how annoyed the designer must have been to see some of the ones they put out in between it's cancellation and eventual release knowing lego was setting on a top-tier helmet.

Edited March 22 by Mandalorianknight

[Swordy]

6 hours ago, BacktoBricks said:

but the hairpiece used on the old Young Boba minifigures is still in production… In fact, I don't believe the hairpiece in black has been out of production for a single year since it was introduced in 2010.

I wish it would give us all a break and go out of production… It’s not like there’s a better mullet hairpiece (the Old Man Luke/Loki hair), or even two (Lloyd’s hair), but three (Obi-Wan show hair). It’s too generic and not even accurate to anyone. Who would wear their hair like that? Maybe the designers just have as much distain for that hairpiece as I do, lol.

I agree that it would’ve served Young Boba well, since none of the options I listed would work, but at this point I wanna see that hairpiece gone like Alderaan.

 

On 3/20/2025 at 6:49 AM, BacktoBricks said:

That being said, I think the majority of people are looking at the hair and wondering why on earth they chose it over several other options. I really don't think it can be said that they have a good grasp of audience reception there. Unless they know it will be disliked and simply don't care. Either way, it doesn't come off well.

I’ll agree on that last point. I argue, though, that any change will have its complaints. You’ll have people who prefer the old for any number of reasons, and plenty of reasons to hate the change. I appreciate the move into something different, even if it was unsuccessful this time.

On 3/20/2025 at 6:49 AM, BacktoBricks said:

The new face expressions too are a downgrade and don't match well with the source material. Lego seems to think youngsters either have sideways smirks or sulky grimaces these days and all the younger characters are turning into, dare I say it, clones of each other. There seems to have been a distinct lack of effort in giving his character a unique expression, but you could I suppose write the expressions off as a design choice. 

To be fair, besides a cartoonishly evil grin, all the emotion we get from young Boba was a sulky grimace. I do agree on the point of LEGO depicting children across all themes; it’s almost as if they stopped paying attention to kids altogether and expect them to be mindless drones. It’s not a design choice in favour of the character, but rather in favour of reuse in HP or something.

On 3/20/2025 at 6:49 AM, BacktoBricks said:

However, I don't think you can really call the lack of dual molded legs anything but lazy or greedy. They can produce dual molded short legs so either they A) didn't want to spend the budget on them or B) they might not have the factory space to produce them. I can't see any other reason not to make the figure more accurate. It's not like the waistcape or legs or skirt argument when it comes to figures sitting down. And if it's A then that speaks for itself, but if it's B then when they are continually acquiring more licenses and making more sets, if that comes at the price of them cutting corners on design, then they can hardly say only the best is good enough. It's a simple case of quantity over quality then. 

Usually in these May 4th UCS sets, one figure gets the deluxe treatment, while the other gets the shaft. I’m still upset about the treatment of Farmboy Luke in the UCS Landspeeder, since obviously LEGO decided that the guy who needed the most care was the short term co-pilot. I’d argue even the 2015 Slave 1 had only one deluxe figure with Boba, and a time where dual molding for, say, Han Solo was technically possible.

As for Boba, yes, dual-molded short legs would’ve been great. However, this is also a figure likely about to see reuse in a cheaper set; we’ve seen before how TLG plans accordingly for such an outcome. We’ve also seen before that TLG is more comfortable with leg and arm printing than they are with dual molding, and the reusability (aka cost-effectiveness) of short blue legs with black boots is very small.

I guess I ascribe to your A) theory. They absolutely could go the extra mile, and they should’ve tried better in a couple other areas. At the end of the day, though, it’s a minor variant of a character who is much cooler as an adult. Young Boba doesn’t have the appeal as OT Threepio or X-Wing Pilot Luke.

At any rate, I hope that all the more budget went into the build itself. These minifigs are just a side attraction for the LEGO hoarders investors, albeit a necessary one nonetheless.

On 3/20/2025 at 5:52 AM, Kit Figsto said:

On the other, OTHER hand, they've never done anything with those Geonosis arena sketch models that we've seen, so maybe they just dislike AOTC 

Ignoring that Geonosis would be so difficult to create in LEGO at any feasible scale (dark orange isn’t the easiest colour with which to build), but AotC isn’t beloved. I myself have a hard time making through the scene where Anakin and Padme are rolling around in the grass of a space buffalo field; meanwhile the Battle of Geonosis is so unclear in its execution that it might as well had been a title card of “Clones shoot droids, none of this matters to the movie’s plot though, and has a small impact on the in-universe story.”

Still, I wouldn’t mind seeing a thing or two new from AotC, and a Geonosis arena and Anakin and Padme picnic diorama would be two of them.

14 hours ago, CloneCommando99 said:

Only a couple more months until we get news on 2026 sets.

 

I need to know whether the nightmare will be over as of 2026… or if this is just the beginning.

It’s funny how, if I remember last year correctly, people started wondering if LEGO had truly cracked down on the leaks. Well, it was only by February that we knew everything left for the year. A 2026 leak in May or June wouldn’t shock me, but I personally like to wait until late in the year to start hearing about the next.

Given that 2022 saw the Hoth sets after the UCS AT-AT, 2023 saw the 501st BP after the UCS Razor Crest (which connects because of the one S3 flashback… right?), and 2024 saw the Clone Trooper and Droid BP after the Venator, I believe we could indeed see an Imperial set or two after the UCS Death Star. If the DS relates any to Endor, I’d very much appreciate some Rebel starfighter appreciation—but mostly, I just want a new B-Wing.

[CallumPears]

Dual-moulded leg C-3PO keychain but they couldn't manage it in the Sail Barge? Yeah sure ok whatever I guess. Far beyond me to question the wisdom of the designers. 

(Not a fan of the dual-moulded C-3PO anyway since it should be silver not grey, but still...)

[BacktoBricks]

6 hours ago, Swordy said:

 I do agree on the point of LEGO depicting children across all themes; it’s almost as if they stopped paying attention to kids altogether and expect them to be mindless drones. It’s not a design choice in favour of the character, but rather in favour of reuse in HP or something.

Exactly this. It's lazy at best and ironic (even a tad disrespectful to children really) in an era where they are trying to push diversity in other areas like skin tones and disabilities. My HP students have a couple of different skintones and yet they are all going the same way as the Rebel Pilot with their face prints. It's almost like they're trying to say we're all the same despite our different skintones. It's really boring to be honest. The Polyjuice Harry and Ron variants are some of my favourite because they actually have some different and quite animated expressions.

 

6 hours ago, Swordy said:

Usually in these May 4th UCS sets, one figure gets the deluxe treatment, while the other gets the shaft. I’m still upset about the treatment of Farmboy Luke in the UCS Landspeeder, since obviously LEGO decided that the guy who needed the most care was the short term co-pilot. I’d argue even the 2015 Slave 1 had only one deluxe figure with Boba, and a time where dual molding for, say, Han Solo was technically possible.

As for Boba, yes, dual-molded short legs would’ve been great. However, this is also a figure likely about to see reuse in a cheaper set; we’ve seen before how TLG plans accordingly for such an outcome. We’ve also seen before that TLG is more comfortable with leg and arm printing than they are with dual molding, and the reusability (aka cost-effectiveness) of short blue legs with black boots is very small.

I guess I ascribe to your A) theory. They absolutely could go the extra mile, and they should’ve tried better in a couple other areas. At the end of the day, though, it’s a minor variant of a character who is much cooler as an adult. Young Boba doesn’t have the appeal as OT Threepio or X-Wing Pilot Luke.

I get what you're saying about one UCS minifigure getting extra at the cost of the other, but should it be like that? Absolutely not in my opinion. Not when the prices are going so high and not if you are a company that is going to underpin your product with the motto that only the best is good enough. The C-3PO with dual molded leg is a fantastic minifigure, but should that mean that Farmboy Luke in the UCS Landspeeder shouldn't have say come with a poncho? Not if you ask me.

And if they absolutely had to cut costs or differentiate Young Boba for the later non-UCS set, then they could always not include dual molded legs for him then just like it sounds like Jango will lose his arm printing. Again, theoretically even that goes against the above motto, but it would at least mean that the figures in the UCS set actually feel like the 'ultimate' edition of these characters.

6 minutes ago, CallumPears said:

Dual-moulded leg C-3PO keychain but they couldn't manage it in the Sail Barge? Yeah sure ok whatever I guess. Far beyond me to question the wisdom of the designers. 

Even the LAN reviewers couldn't help but call out threepio in the Sail Barge.  

[Lego Nostalgia]

10 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

Oh man not the light printing on a dark color, it'd just look like her skirt had white triangles painted on them.

Yeah exactly nobody's actually hurt by a more accurate slave leia.

How in San Hill do I know the name of that vehicle.... I looked it up and it's only ever been in the 5 seconds of the movie, a panel or two in the disney theme park comic, and had it's ruins mentioned in Tarkin. (Presumably I know it from that last one, I guess, since it wasn't named in the film and I never read the comic. For the sake of completion, in Legends it could be seen in a Battlefront 2 (2005) cutscene and it's wreckage was present in TFU). Which really puts into perspective how obscure this thing is- usually the "twelve seconds in the background of a movie" vehicles or characters show up more frequently or get fleshed out in comics, games, tv shows, etc, but the UT-AT's only managed to get two flashback cameos by virtue of being present in the scene where Ki-Adi Mundi dies, and two cameos as smoldering wreckage. I'd honestly put this as a justifier-level set in terms of cost/obscurity, though I think the justifier still edges it out in terms of how baffling a decision it is because as obscure as the UT-AT is, we at least know WHY it was chosen. I can't imagine lego thought Cad would carry a $170 set alone.

I agree with your wider point but if I was the guy who designed that helmet and it got cancelled I'd be walking in to the exec's office every day to plead it's case, that's the best helmet by a mile and I can't imagine how annoyed the designer must have been to see some of the ones they put out in between it's cancellation and eventual release knowing lego was setting on a top-tier helmet.

Wasn't there a Royal Guard helmet supposed to release but got cancelled ? I remember that was it 2 years ago

[Brickwraith]

1 hour ago, Lego Nostalgia said:

Wasn't there a Royal Guard helmet supposed to release but got cancelled ? I remember that was it 2 years ago

I don't remember every hearing any rumors about that. I think it was just in the background of some promotional images but there was never anything about it actually being a part of upcoming set rumors

[Mandalorianknight]

4 hours ago, BacktoBricks said:

It's almost like they're trying to say we're all the same despite our different skintones. It's really boring to be honest.

I get what you're saying about one UCS minifigure getting extra at the cost of the other, but should it be like that? Absolutely not in my opinion. Not when the prices are going so high and not if you are a company that is going to underpin your product with the motto that only the best is good enough. The C-3PO with dual molded leg is a fantastic minifigure, but should that mean that Farmboy Luke in the UCS Landspeeder shouldn't have say come with a poncho? Not if you ask me.

If only there was some other way to get that across. Maybe all the figures could have one singular skin tone, one nobody in real life has, maybe a primary color like red or blue. Not in licensed themes, since you'd want the characters to look like the ones in the movies/shows, but in sets based on original IP or generic situations like City.  

(Jokes aside, I actually am a fan of when lego uses the same face print on different skin tones, but I also like my figures to look like the people present onscreen in the movies. Either way I don't really have a dog in the fight with your wider point, I don't collect many minifigures of kids, but I saw the opportunity for the joke about Classic Yellow and had to take it.)

We should get higher budgets for some of these UCS sets but it always will end up coming down to allocation, that's just how it works. They can't have an unlimited budget. Of course the sail barge should have had more figures with dual molding (and more figures in general), but it'll always come down to one figure being more detailed than another. 

2 hours ago, Lego Nostalgia said:

Wasn't there a Royal Guard helmet supposed to release but got cancelled ? I remember that was it 2 years ago

It was speculated pretty heavily but all we actually saw was a stock model in the background that didn't really look the same as the other helmet designs. There weren't any leaks about it actually having a set listing IIRC.

[CloneCommando99]

I’ve been revisiting the U-Wing pics and the troop compartment appears to be 6 studs long. Which isn’t actually all that shorter than the 2016 model. I reckon you could fit 4 troops in there with some seating modifications.

It actually makes me sad that we may never get a wave as insanely good as RO ever again. So many brilliant sets. And they still have ground from that movie which will likely never be covered. (Cargo Shuttle, Scariff Citadel, Partisan X-Wing, Eadu, Profundity…) it’s a shame. Out of all the Disney movies RO still holds up the best. 

 

Edited March 22 by CloneCommando99

[Llewop]

2 minutes ago, CloneCommando99 said:

I’ve been revisiting the U-Wing pics and the troop compartment appears to be 6 studs long. Which isn’t actually all that shorter than the 2016 model. I reckon you could fit 4 troops in there with some seating modifications.

It actually makes me sad that we may never get a wave as insanely good as RO ever again. So many brilliant sets. And they still have ground from that movie which will likely never be covered. (Cargo Shuttle, Scariff Citadel, Partisan X-Wing, Eadu, Profundity…) it’s a shame. Out of all the Disney movies RO still hold up the best. 

 

I need more pictures of the U wing but to me that compartment looks tiny like I don’t know if the figures will even be able to stand. 

I agree the rogue one wave was pretty good just a shame SW films are so hard to release to get this level of quality again 

[Mandalorianknight]

1 hour ago, CloneCommando99 said:

I’ve been revisiting the U-Wing pics and the troop compartment appears to be 6 studs long. Which isn’t actually all that shorter than the 2016 model. I reckon you could fit 4 troops in there with some seating modifications.
It actually makes me sad that we may never get a wave as insanely good as RO ever again. So many brilliant sets. And they still have ground from that movie which will likely never be covered. (Cargo Shuttle, Scariff Citadel, Partisan X-Wing, Eadu, Profundity…) it’s a shame. Out of all the Disney movies RO still holds up the best. 

I fiddled with my 2016 U-wing back when we first got images of the Andor one and I honestly think the Andor one will be able to fit MORE figures.

That wave really was just 5 hydrogen bombs in terms of set quality. Every set was near-perfect. It was the first and only wave I ever bought every set from, and I'm still annoyed with myself for selling the TIE striker for space and parting out Krennic's shuttle.

1 hour ago, Llewop said:

I need more pictures of the U wing but to me that compartment looks tiny like I don’t know if the figures will even be able to stand. 

...they can't stand in the 2016 one either....

[Llewop]

9 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

I fiddled with my 2016 U-wing back when we first got images of the Andor one and I honestly think the Andor one will be able to fit MORE figures.

That wave really was just 5 hydrogen bombs in terms of set quality. Every set was near-perfect. It was the first and only wave I ever bought every set from, and I'm still annoyed with myself for selling the TIE striker for space and parting out Krennic's shuttle.

...they can't stand in the 2016 one either....

Could they not? I seem to remember being able to fit loads in the old one. I still think it looks too small. I’m surprised we haven’t been able to get more pictures yet or any of the May sets yet. 

those Rogue one sets are probably some of if not the best wave in Lego. It had everything 2 perfect BPs, a new AtST (which we hadn’t had for ages), a new imperial tank, new tie, a new y wing, every new imperial trooper variant (death and shore troopers) every major character (except Saw). It would be very hard to argue with what they missed. They also didn’t have like Jyn or Cassian in every set, which we know is going to be the opposite with the Mando movie he’ll literally be in every set. 

those movie waves we got in the 2010s were pretty epic. It’s a shame with the TV show they can’t do the same because of revealing spoilers from the show. These days you have a set you see in the trailer and then the next wave you get your spoiler set. 

[Renown]

His name's not Boba. He's Lucky. 

[Mandalorianknight]

8 hours ago, Llewop said:

Could they not? I seem to remember being able to fit loads in the old one. I still think it looks too small. I’m surprised we haven’t been able to get more pictures yet or any of the May sets yet. 

those Rogue one sets are probably some of if not the best wave in Lego. It had everything 2 perfect BPs, a new AtST (which we hadn’t had for ages), a new imperial tank, new tie, a new y wing, every new imperial trooper variant (death and shore troopers) every major character (except Saw). It would be very hard to argue with what they missed. They also didn’t have like Jyn or Cassian in every set, which we know is going to be the opposite with the Mando movie he’ll literally be in every set. 

those movie waves we got in the 2010s were pretty epic. It’s a shame with the TV show they can’t do the same because of revealing spoilers from the show. These days you have a set you see in the trailer and then the next wave you get your spoiler set. 

I know I went back and checked when the U-wing leaked and thought I wrote a post on it but I can't find it. I'm not with my U-wing right now but looking at the instructions, there's a 7x6 opening with the middle stud-width of one end occupied by a liftarm, and significantly more space occupied by the stud shooters on the pintles. If I remember right, and looking at the instructions seems to back this up, even removing the seats and pintle-mounted guns, the original U-wing could hold 5-6 people in the cargo bay max, and that includes removing all their weapons and contorting the last two in some pretty uncomfortable ways to fit in the middle. I'm pretty confident figures couldn't stand in the 2016 one, but I can't disprove it, though either way I don't think it increases the amount of figs who can fit inside- the issue isn't that there's not enough floor space for the legs, it's the torsos and heads.

[CloneCommando99]

5 minutes ago, Renown said:

His name's not Boba. He's Lucky. 

Ah. I take it that means the Slave One in August will be TCW based.

 

God damn it! They’re gonna worm Commander Pons into the set aren’t they?!!

 

Edited March 23 by CloneCommando99

[Mandalorianknight]

9 minutes ago, Renown said:

His name's not Boba. He's Lucky. 

Interesting. This could mean a few things:

Cadets in a set, presumably the system Slave 1

The system Slave 1 is clone wars based (is there no end) from when Aurra owns it.

I'm torn. I'd rather have a new Aurra or Hondo than clone cadet figures, but if it's TCW based, no Jango. Either way, this implies that the system slave 1 will definitely be either a clone wars set or set that involves non-jango/boba clones, which... lego I'm begging you, please....

Actually, if we squint and cope hard enough, it means anyone who didn't want full clone domination is lucky, the leak was wrong, and that last system set isn't another Jango Slave 1 but actually an OT set. (There's no way whatsoever this is what he meant.)

4 minutes ago, CloneCommando99 said:

God damn it! They’re gonna worm Commander Pons into the set aren’t they?!

They fact that he specifically chose a quote from one of the other cadets and not Aurra or something makes me think we'll be seeing clone cadets... this really is the Year of the Clone. Even the ones without the cool armor get figs... 

....there's only one possible reason this is happening to this extent.... the kaminoans have taken control of Denmark.

Edited March 23 by Mandalorianknight

[CloneCommando99]

9 minutes ago, Mandalorianknight said:

Even the ones without the cool armor get figs... 

When I said I wanted Clone Cadets (6 months ago) I meant Domino Squad in training armour Lego!!! 

[Zap Rowsdower]

 

2 hours ago, Renown said:

His name's not Boba. He's Lucky. 

I actually would really love a Clone Wars version of the Slave I. Jango Fett's ship would look a little anachronistic sitting beside other clone wars vehicles on my shelf. 

A ship based on the season 2 "Death Trap" arc opens the door to new Aurra Sing and Hondo figures. Maybe throw in Mace Windu, Admiral Killian, Bossk, or another jedi if they're feeling generous. 

Pretty sure the Slave I had the same paint scheme as Jango's but Hando does take possession of it at the end of the arc and repaints it green and brown so there is some room for variation. 

[JohnTPT17]

It could also be a hint towards why Plo Koon is in his own microfighter - there's a chance he could be thrown into whatever Death Trap related set it ends up being. He was also involved with that arc, working with Ahsoka in finding the bounty hunters.

[starlego98]

Its the pod scape  with the clone kids from the clone wars episode. Its the gwp

[CloneCommando99]

Nope. Childish is saying the May 4th Promo is the escape pod from the Boba arc, with Clone cadets. Actually pretty neat ngl.

On 1/9/2025 at 8:04 PM, THELEGOBATMAN said:

Clone set, obviously.

And we have a winner!

 

I wish pick a brick qualified on May 4th. I might have to see if any of my friends have any SW sets they want.

Edited March 23 by CloneCommando99

[CallumPears]

Ok that GWP sounds amazing. 

I've wanted a Republic escape pod for a while now for the scene from Rising Malevolence, but this will also do nicely. And finally some Clone cadet figures.

Not sure there are any sets I actually want to reach the threshold, but I'll definitely try to get it on eBay or something.

[Llewop]

Glad for those who like the gwp. I like that they keep putting sets with figures as a gwp just this one doesn’t do it for me. I’m kind of glad as apart from the U wing there is nothing else I really want to get to the threshold