Marvel Superheroes 2023 - Rumors & Discussion

[Toast]

19 hours ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

Accordung to exabricks, the AT will be revealed on the 14th of November and released 10 days later  There‘s almost no chance it won‘t leak before that though  

The AT is by far my most anticipated set of 2023 and I can't wait to see it, but part of my hopes that it doesn't leak so I my first look at it is in its best form. I don't know whats wrong with me, is this what growing up is??

[cosmic]

7 hours ago, THELEGOBATMAN said:

Wolverine does not need dual-moulded arms. In fact, his arms are not covered at all in that suit.

The X-Mansion was just a preliminary concept. The build doesn't have to represent what we'll get. It might, but that's unknown for now.

Also, the leak had four new X-Men (Professor X, Mystique, Emma Frost and Sabretooth). Don't know where you got that it was just one.

As for the X-Jet, we'll be lucky if only half the minifigures in that set are repeats. 

Wolverine, I will admit is hard to acknowledge. The blue shoulder pads they printed on the upper half of his sleeve could have just been a blue shoulder armor piece (I’m thinking 41637). But I googled his suit and his blue gloves do go wel above his wrist simply giving him blue hands would not have properly depicted the length of his gloves. At the end of the day the awkward length where his blue shoulder pads cut off are unsightly on this figure as its not well covered on all angles. But to say this figure had completey barren arms is untrue. Google 90’s Wolverine, between the blue from his gloves to the blue on his shoulder pads I think its unfair to say his figure could have hard completely barren arms from all the images I can find its just his upper arm and right below his elbow that is exposed. If anything they should have given him the blue shoulder armor, skipped the blue printing on the top and given him dual molded arms but with blue on the bottom to more accurately depict the length of his gloves. But pop a completely flesh tone arm on this Wolverine I promise you it will look funky.

But again Wolverine is neither here nor there he’s the least offensive offender when it comes to this trend. But to acknowledge your other point I considered Emma an antihero and I was categorizing Sabertooth, Mystique and Magneto as members of the brotherhood of Evil Mutants so the way I was framing things in my mind I considered Professor X the only new hero but yes I acknowledge he was not the only new character. That said even if we get 3 new villains in addition to 1 new hero, am I wrong for being disappointed we only got 1 new hero in such a large set? Seems like a fair complaint.

Unless of course you are correct. Its all just preliminary and both the building design and figures can be drastically improved upon. That is still a fair possibility but as I acknowledged in my initial comment all the other leaked sets in the Survey included builds that looked official and character lineups that were satisfying. The X Mansion had the most to improve upon and I feel its fair to be concerned bc yes a lot can be changed but no other set in that survey got so much wrong like this leak did. Plus I adore these characters so yes I can see that my commentary may seem nitpicky and a bit negative and for that I do apologize. But stubborn as I am I still think there is cause for concern but because you brought up the slight hope that I may prove to be wrong I’ll leave it alone for now and comment again when official photos confirm we end up getting just Wolverine and Magneto in the set 😆

[THELEGOBATMAN]

55 minutes ago, cosmic said:

Wolverine, I will admit is hard to acknowledge. The blue shoulder pads they printed on the upper half of his sleeve could have just been a blue shoulder armor piece (I’m thinking 41637). But I googled his suit and his blue gloves do go wel above his wrist simply giving him blue hands would not have properly depicted the length of his gloves. At the end of the day the awkward length where his blue shoulder pads cut off are unsightly on this figure as its not well covered on all angles. But to say this figure had completey barren arms is untrue. Google 90’s Wolverine, between the blue from his gloves to the blue on his shoulder pads I think its unfair to say his figure could have hard completely barren arms from all the images I can find its just his upper arm and right below his elbow that is exposed. If anything they should have given him the blue shoulder armor, skipped the blue printing on the top and given him dual molded arms but with blue on the bottom to more accurately depict the length of his gloves. But pop a completely flesh tone arm on this Wolverine I promise you it will look funky.

Honestly, I think either work. I love the one we got, but it could also be cool with the shoulder armour and dual-moulded legs one. Both have their downsides, and I'd be fine with both. 

If we get that minifigure in a set (X-Jet or X-Mansion) they'll have to modify it, which probably means no arm and leg printing — it's gonna look much worse.

58 minutes ago, cosmic said:

But again Wolverine is neither here nor there he’s the least offensive offender when it comes to this trend. But to acknowledge your other point I considered Emma an antihero and I was categorizing Sabertooth, Mystique and Magneto as members of the brotherhood of Evil Mutants so the way I was framing things in my mind I considered Professor X the only new hero but yes I acknowledge he was not the only new character. That said even if we get 3 new villains in addition to 1 new hero, am I wrong for being disappointed we only got 1 new hero in such a large set? Seems like a fair complaint.

I completely agree with you about new characters tho. I thought you meant characters in general.

After all, the set is the X-Mansion — a school for young Mutants, while the set doesn't have a single student. That's ridiculous. 

If we get that set down the line, I hope they start the design process from scratch. The build is not it, it looks like a facade that's thin enough to mount it on one's wall. It also needs to feel like a school imo, and not a battleground for experienced Mutants — it needs characters like Nightcrawler or Jubilee.

[JeanGreyForever]

9 hours ago, THELEGOBATMAN said:

Wolverine does not need dual-moulded arms. In fact, his arms are not covered at all in that suit.

The X-Mansion was just a preliminary concept. The build doesn't have to represent what we'll get. It might, but that's unknown for now.

Also, the leak had four new X-Men (Professor X, Mystique, Emma Frost and Sabretooth). Don't know where you got that it was just one.

As for the X-Jet, we'll be lucky if only half the minifigures in that set are repeats. 

Only one of those characters you mentioned is an actual X-Man with Professor X. 

[psqidexslizer]

2 minutes ago, JeanGreyForever said:

Only one of those characters you mentioned is an actual X-Man with Professor X. 

Actually, they have all been members of the X-Men at some point in the past. Even Sabertooth.

[JeanGreyForever]

18 hours ago, cosmic said:

Thank you, you as well. I grew up in the early 2000’s when the X Men, Fantastic 4, Jessica Drew, (and even Tigra, Wasp, and Namor) were all more heavily included in video games, animation and merchandising (shirts, bags, toys etc) than they are currently. So having grown up with these characters more prominently featured, I was always a huge fan of Spiderwoman and the Phoenix. they are 2 of my favorites so its kind of annoying of all characters, that they would be exclusive as of now. Really need them to get remade.

Anyways I’m most excited to get Helen Cho and Vision in this upcoming Avengers Tower. As of now I have no vision in my collection so thats very exciting to get. I hope Helen gets a new torso print and not a generic nurse outfit.

I grew up with Marvel at the same time as you did. All those characters you listed plus the ones that were heavily promoted because of the Fox and Sony movies. And the X-Men and FF weren't ignored back then which was a plus since those were the main two teams I cared for. Spider-Woman was lucky that she was the only female team member of the New Avengers, and that was Marvel's flagship book so she was heavily promoted as Marvel's premiere female character. When Ms. Marvel joined, she became the other main flagship heroine of Marvel as they were heavily promoting her. Unfortunately, Spider-Woman has lost a lot of her prominence since then, in part because unlike her contemporaries such as Carol Danvers and She-Hulk, she's not in the MCU. Then Marvel began to really build up the Spider-Man universe and family and Miles Morales and Spider-Gwen took off with Spider-Gwen being promoted as the main female spider over Jessica. Really would have liked to have seen Jessica in the Daily Bugle set, even if she's more an Avengers character than a Spider-Man character.

Elektra is another one I wish had been included due to her ties with Daredevil. And while she doesn't have much connection with Spider-Man in the comics, she was more heavily featured in the Ultimate Spier-Man comics. Elektra was another character who was heavily promoted in the 2000s and was more or less the main female character who appeared on merchandise back then, alongside Jean, Storm, and the Invisible Woman.

I'm happy we're getting an Avengers Tower but as someone who prefers the comic Avengers, I wish we could get an Avengers Mansion with all the comic book outfits instead.

 

4 minutes ago, psqidexslizer said:

Actually, they have all been members of the X-Men at some point in the past. Even Sabertooth.

I'm aware but by that logic, we can also consider Mr. Fantastic and Invisible Woman to be Avengers since they were briefly members. Same with the Thing. For the general public, only Xavier out of that list would be considered an X-Man. Maybe Mystique would be considered one because of the FoX-Men movies. However, these sets are not based off of the comics or movies but the 90s show. Ergo, Xavier is the only X-Man and even he's not one anymore since he left the team and earth.

7 hours ago, psqidexslizer said:

Also, I really don’t know what you mean by “classic” team, because the 90’s show left out quite a few big names from the roster such as Nightcrawler, Colossus, and Kitty Pryde.

Nightcrawler is very likely since he's joining the team in the new show. He was also heavily promoted in the original show despite only appearing in two episodes. Yet in the DVDs containing the entire original series, he was on two covers.

I can see Colossus appearing down the line if he appears in the new show. He was in the original for two episodes also but he never even appeared in costume.

Kitty will depend on whether or not they introduce her in the new show. They specifically left her out of the original, first because Marvel mandated that Kitty not be included and then later on they felt she was superfluous with Jubilee there.

[cosmic]

1 hour ago, THELEGOBATMAN said:

Honestly, I think either work. I love the one we got, but it could also be cool with the shoulder armour and dual-moulded legs one. Both have their downsides, and I'd be fine with both. 

If we get that minifigure in a set (X-Jet or X-Mansion) they'll have to modify it, which probably means no arm and leg printing — it's gonna look much worse.

I completely agree with you about new characters tho. I thought you meant characters in general.

After all, the set is the X-Mansion — a school for young Mutants, while the set doesn't have a single student. That's ridiculous. 

If we get that set down the line, I hope they start the design process from scratch. The build is not it, it looks like a facade that's thin enough to mount it on one's wall. It also needs to feel like a school imo, and not a battleground for experienced Mutants — it needs characters like Nightcrawler or Jubilee.

Yeah I’ll agree to back off about Wolverine lol. I wanted to emphasize my point that some sort of corner was cut on all X Men media but he’s a terrible example because while he is not perfect he is very darn close. But Storm needed a Tiara and we needed more X Men in both the Mansion and Jet but since we are unsure about exactly how those will play out I’ll wait and see. Its fun to speculate though.

31 minutes ago, JeanGreyForever said:

I grew up with Marvel at the same time as you did. All those characters you listed plus the ones that were heavily promoted because of the Fox and Sony movies. And the X-Men and FF weren't ignored back then which was a plus since those were the main two teams I cared for. Spider-Woman was lucky that she was the only female team member of the New Avengers, and that was Marvel's flagship book so she was heavily promoted as Marvel's premiere female character. When Ms. Marvel joined, she became the other main flagship heroine of Marvel as they were heavily promoting her. Unfortunately, Spider-Woman has lost a lot of her prominence since then, in part because unlike her contemporaries such as Carol Danvers and She-Hulk, she's not in the MCU. Then Marvel began to really build up the Spider-Man universe and family and Miles Morales and Spider-Gwen took off with Spider-Gwen being promoted as the main female spider over Jessica. Really would have liked to have seen Jessica in the Daily Bugle set, even if she's more an Avengers character than a Spider-Man character.

Elektra is another one I wish had been included due to her ties with Daredevil. And while she doesn't have much connection with Spider-Man in the comics, she was more heavily featured in the Ultimate Spier-Man comics. Elektra was another character who was heavily promoted in the 2000s and was more or less the main female character who appeared on merchandise back then, alongside Jean, Storm, and the Invisible Woman.

I'm happy we're getting an Avengers Tower but as someone who prefers the comic Avengers, I wish we could get an Avengers Mansion with all the comic book outfits instead.

Porque no los dos? I adore the comic designs and do prefer them over the MCU designs but Lego Marvel has done a really good job of balancing both cinematic and comic sets so far. I mean we got the Daily Bugle in the past and we are almost guaranteed to be getting an X Mansion (its cartoon accurate but that is almost interchangeable with being comic accurate) so its not like they have disregarded comic material when it comes to large sets in the past. So in time, I’m sure both comic fans and MCU fans will have the content they desire. This isn’t Lego DC lol no need to compromise. lego Marvels fandom is much more spoiled than we give ourselves credit for (even if it was spiteful to have 2 of the most important female heroes as SDCC exclusives when the theme started out, that one still hurts lol). 
 

And now that you mention it yes! Electra, and Daredevil should have made my list of “not used as much as the late 90s early 2000’s” characters along with Spiderwoman, the F4 and Namor (who’s thankfully rebounding after Wakanda Forever). And completely agree their pack of inclusion in the MCU is clearly why. That said I still really want both released right without having to fork over a few thousand for each.

 

Also do you think people who forked over good money for those SDCC figs would be mad if a better version with dual molded arms and legs and a better hairpiece gets released down the line? Or would they be fine knowing their version is still exclusive? Maybe people with first hand perspective who paid a lot to get them can comment. Also its not meant to be shady if you have several thousand dollars to spare on a single Lego figure trust I am jealous of you lol (kidding, sorta) Just curious.

[JeanGreyForever]

19 minutes ago, cosmic said:

Porque no los dos? I adore the comic designs and do prefer them over the MCU designs but Lego Marvel has done a really good job of balancing both cinematic and comic sets so far. I mean we got the Daily Bugle in the past and we are almost guaranteed to be getting an X Mansion (its cartoon accurate but that is almost interchangeable with being comic accurate) so its not like they have disregarded comic material when it comes to large sets in the past. So in time, I’m sure both comic fans and MCU fans will have the content they desire. This isn’t Lego DC lol no need to compromise. lego Marvels fandom is much more spoiled than we give ourselves credit for (even if it was spiteful to have 2 of the most important female heroes as SDCC exclusives when the theme started out, that one still hurts lol). 
 

And now that you mention it yes! Electra, and Daredevil should have made my list of “not used as much as the late 90s early 2000’s” characters along with Spiderwoman, the F4 and Namor (who’s thankfully rebounding after Wakanda Forever). And completely agree their pack of inclusion in the MCU is clearly why. That said I still really want both released right without having to fork over a few thousand for each.

 

Also do you think people who forked over good money for those SDCC figs would be mad if a better version with dual molded arms and legs and a better hairpiece gets released down the line? Or would they be fine knowing their version is still exclusive? Maybe people with first hand perspective who paid a lot to get them can comment. Also its not meant to be shady if you have several thousand dollars to spare on a single Lego figure trust I am jealous of you lol (kidding, sorta) Just curious.

The Daily Bugle was a good set even if that focused more on Spider-Man for obvious reasons rather than the Classic Avengers. I was glad to see Firestar included but somewhat disappointed by the lack of leg printing to depict her boots. It makes me hope we might one day see another version of Firestar released but with boots. Same with the lack of dual-molded arms for her gloves. And I remember Firestar having no patterns or design on her chest so the fact that they put so much printing on her torso was also a strange choice imo. When it comes to the Avengers, I'd like to see more comic accurate versions like classic Hawkeye in the purple mask, Scarlet Witch in her pink and red costume with cape, Vision in his comic costume with cape and collar rather than the muted colors of his MCU version, etc. Not to mention a classic Ms. Marvel (the Carol Danvers version) or a new classic Thor minifigure with leg printing for his boots and a more accurate helmet/hair combo rather than just generic hair. Lego seems more open to using comic depictions for Spider-Man than the Avengers anyway. Like you said, thankfully with the X-Men the depictions in the cartoon are more or less comic accurate so that isn't an issue for them. But bringing back that SDCC Spider-Woman minifigure, she'd fit in more with the X-Men minifigs than the MCU Avengers ones.

Daredevil and Elektra also had rights issues because they were Fox characters. Those rights reverted earlier back to Marvel than with the FF and X-Men because there were no new movies with them but even then, Marvel hasn't done much merchandise with those two because they were first linked with the Netflix series which was too mature for kids merchandise. Daredevil at least did get a minifigure finally but I'd like to see more of him and his characters.

Are the Jean and Spider-Woman figures both ranging around $1000-$2000 each? When they first came out, I remember the average price for them was about $250 each. It is annoying that they were specifically chosen as exclusive figures because of their popularity. The fact that their designs are so outdated now does give me hope we'll one day see new versions of them which will technically keep the originals as exclusives.

[THELEGOBATMAN]

7 hours ago, JeanGreyForever said:

Only one of those characters you mentioned is an actual X-Man with Professor X. 

As in X-Men characters. 

[Shiva]

Ain't Emma Frost, still an X-man "X-Men?" ? in the comics?

[psqidexslizer]

11 hours ago, cosmic said:

Porque no los dos? I adore the comic designs and do prefer them over the MCU designs but Lego Marvel has done a really good job of balancing both cinematic and comic sets so far. I mean we got the Daily Bugle in the past and we are almost guaranteed to be getting an X Mansion (its cartoon accurate but that is almost interchangeable with being comic accurate) so its not like they have disregarded comic material when it comes to large sets in the past. So in time, I’m sure both comic fans and MCU fans will have the content they desire. This isn’t Lego DC lol no need to compromise. lego Marvels fandom is much more spoiled than we give ourselves credit for (even if it was spiteful to have 2 of the most important female heroes as SDCC exclusives when the theme started out, that one still hurts lol). 

We’re gotten plenty of comic based sets, sure. But nearly all of them are Spider-Man.

That said, as far as the Avengers go we’ve gotten comic accurate versions of Iron Man, Captain America, Thor, Hulk, Hawkeye, Black Panther, Falcon, She-Hulk, Miss Marvel, Captain Marvel, War Machine, Red Skull, Red Hulk, Red She-Hulk, Justin Hammer, Thanos, Taskmaster, and Modok. Which is a pretty good selection for the, idk, 5 comic based sets we’ve gotten in the past 11 years.

There’s still Avengers characters I’d like to see get comic adaptations, namely Black Widow, Scarlet Witch, Quicksilver, Wasp, Ant-Man, Dr Strange, Vision, Loki, Kang, Baron Zemo, Enchantress, Leader, Abomination, Baron Mordo, and Ultron. I understand why Lego chooses focus on the MCU instead of comic accurate sets. But still, I’d like to see maybe two or three sets and a couple of mechs just to narrow down this list.

Also, the real disappointment when it comes to Lego Marvel, IMO, is that we still haven’t seen anyone from the Fantastic Four. Just one set is all it would take to give us the whole team. Doesn’t even have to be a Fantastic Four set. Just throw them and the Fantasticar in a Spider-Man set and call it a day. But between the movies flopping and Marvel’s (now-lifted) ban on Fantastic Four and X-Men sets, it doesn’t seem likely that we’ll get them for a few years. 

Edited September 23, 2023 by psqidexslizer

[psqidexslizer]

2 hours ago, Shiva said:

Ain't Emma Frost, still an X-man "X-Men?" ? in the comics?

Technically, no? I mean, there’s not really an X-Men team atm, but she wasn’t on the most recent rosters.

Edited September 23, 2023 by psqidexslizer

[Lemerbrix]

Need some advice, I need a good way to find moon knight, but without a scale, are there any other efficient methods that have been proven to work to find moon knight?

[NXS7]

46 minutes ago, Lemerbrix said:

Need some advice, I need a good way to find moon knight, but without a scale, are there any other efficient methods that have been proven to work to find moon knight?

eBay

[JeanGreyForever]

8 hours ago, psqidexslizer said:

Also, the real disappointment when it comes to Lego Marvel, IMO, is that we still haven’t seen anyone from the Fantastic Four. Just one set is all it would take to give us the whole team. Doesn’t even have to be a Fantastic Four set. Just throw them and the Fantasticar in a Spider-Man set and call it a day. But between the movies flopping and Marvel’s (now-lifted) ban on Fantastic Four and X-Men sets, it doesn’t seem likely that we’ll get them for a few years. 

Considering the Human Torch and Spider-Man's friendship, it would have been really easy to throw him into the Daily Bugle set. I'm guessing Marvel is holding back on FF Lego sets or minifigs for a reason. At least we have Doom.

[psqidexslizer]

23 minutes ago, JeanGreyForever said:

Considering the Human Torch and Spider-Man's friendship, it would have been really easy to throw him into the Daily Bugle set. I'm guessing Marvel is holding back on FF Lego sets or minifigs for a reason. At least we have Doom.

If I’m not mistaken, the designer for the Daily Bugle mentioned him as well as Iceman as characters he wanted to put in the set but didn’t. He also made it sound like Marvel didn’t approve the choices because of the X-Men and Fantastic Four merchandizing ban that was in effect at the time. Would be pretty cool if Lego could sneak the two of them into future comic-based Spider-Man sets.

[JeanGreyForever]

11 minutes ago, psqidexslizer said:

If I’m not mistaken, the designer for the Daily Bugle mentioned him as well as Iceman as characters he wanted to put in the set but didn’t. He also made it sound like Marvel didn’t approve the choices because of the X-Men and Fantastic Four merchandizing ban that was in effect at the time. Would be pretty cool if Lego could sneak the two of them into future comic-based Spider-Man sets.

Didn't the Daily Bugle set come out in early 2022? The Disney/Fox deal had already been in effect since 2019 so that never made much sense to me. The X-Men had already started to come back in merchandise by then. I know these sets are planned years in advance but it seems strange that in a 2-year span they couldn't add two minifigures.

You're right that it would be nice to see both of them pop up in future Spider-Man sets. Iceman isn't a part of the main cast of the X-Men series so it would probably be easier to get him this way. As for the Torch, they could include him in his flame on mode and if we ever get FF sets later on, we could get him in his actual FF costume.

[PhoenixBuilder]

A few instagram accounts saying the reveal of the Tower is due 14 November - seems pretty late considering the VIP weekend will presumably start 17 Nov - I guess as a D2C it’s not inconceivable it’s announced at that point along with the rest of the weekend’s offers?

[JeanGreyForever]

Do we know yet how many minifigures are in the tower set?

[psqidexslizer]

1 hour ago, JeanGreyForever said:

Didn't the Daily Bugle set come out in early 2022? The Disney/Fox deal had already been in effect since 2019 so that never made much sense to me. The X-Men had already started to come back in merchandise by then. I know these sets are planned years in advance but it seems strange that in a 2-year span they couldn't add two minifigures.

You're right that it would be nice to see both of them pop up in future Spider-Man sets. Iceman isn't a part of the main cast of the X-Men series so it would probably be easier to get him this way. As for the Torch, they could include him in his flame on mode and if we ever get FF sets later on, we could get him in his actual FF costume.

It came out in 2021 while Lego didn’t start released X-Men merchandise again until 2022.

If memory serves, he didn’t come right out and say they weren’t allowed to use them. He said there were characters they couldn’t use and characters they had to cut because they didn’t have the room. And he mentioned those two as choices that didn’t make the cut without saying why. Does seem weird though that Blade would make the cut over Iceman and Human Torch who actually are friends with Spider-Man, but I’m just speculating here.

25 minutes ago, JeanGreyForever said:

Do we know yet how many minifigures are in the tower set?

At least 22 is the rumor.

Iron Man suits (x2), Hulk (bigfig), Falcon, Vision, Wasp, Ultron, Hawkeye, Helen Cho, Antman (microfigure), Chitauri (x4), Tony Stark, Captain America, Black Widow, War Machine, Scarlet Witch, Pepper Potts, Nick Fury, and Wong.

Edited September 23, 2023 by psqidexslizer

[PGBQW]

1 hour ago, psqidexslizer said:

At least 22 is the rumor.

Iron Man suits (x2), Hulk (bigfig), Falcon, Vision, Wasp, Ultron, Hawkeye, Helen Cho, Antman (microfigure), Chitauri (x4), Tony Stark, Captain America, Black Widow, War Machine, Scarlet Witch, Pepper Potts, Nick Fury, and Wong.

Very surprised they'd include Ultron but no Ultron Bots

2 hours ago, JeanGreyForever said:

Didn't the Daily Bugle set come out in early 2022? The Disney/Fox deal had already been in effect since 2019

You know what the say, The Daily Bugle wasn't built in a day

[Lion King]

5 hours ago, JeanGreyForever said:

Didn't the Daily Bugle set come out in early 2022? 

Actually, May 2021. 

[Shiva]

21 hours ago, psqidexslizer said:

Technically, no? I mean, there’s not really an X-Men team atm, but she wasn’t on the most recent rosters.

Cheers.

I haven't been in the X-Men "+Avengers" comics loop since, sometime after AvX. And Spider-Man + Punisher, just before Secret Wars "2015".

If I understand it right, then the LEGO chars are based on the X-Men: The Animated Series. And X-Men '97 ?

[psqidexslizer]

1 hour ago, Shiva said:

Cheers.

I haven't been in the X-Men "+Avengers" comics loop since, sometime after AvX. And Spider-Man + Punisher, just before Secret Wars "2015".

If I understand it right, then the LEGO chars are based on the X-Men: The Animated Series. And X-Men '97 ?

The three from the CMF are all based on the animated series and its revival (which are technically all direct 1-1 adaptations of the comics, except Storm who didn’t have a Mohawk when wearing the white suit.) The ones from previous sets have all been comic based.

Edited September 24, 2023 by psqidexslizer

[TandNbricks]

Pretty sure Ice man and FF weren't included because Marvel told them no. It wasn't licensing because Marvel/Disney already got them back. It's more like waiting for Marvel to encourage focusing on those characters. I believe this was mentioned in the designers AMA and other interviews.