Eurobricks Forums: Power Functions trouble - Eurobricks Forums

Jump to content

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2

Power Functions trouble ...buying power functions? Read this!

#1 User is offline   simonwillems 


  • Technic Campaigner

  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Counts
  • Posts: 1329
  • Joined: 08-December 06
  • Member: 1116
  • Country:The Netherlands

Posted 04 February 2008 - 01:02 PM

Hello there,

As we all know Lego brought the Power Functions, as used in the big 8275 bulldozer, on the market as servicepacks on Shop at Home, so now you can buy all components separately (they also increased the price shortly after, but that's a different story...).

All the components used in the buldozer are there, but also an extension wire to connect the old 9 volt system to the new power functions system.

Recently I bought some power functions: motor, receivers, remote and extension wires. I already had the old system which uses this kind of battery box and I thought that with the new extension wires one could use this (to save space inside the MOC) to power the system. Consequently I did not buy a new batterybox.

Here's the problem: the motor works fine with the extensionwire leading directly to the old battery box without using the receivers, but the receivers do not work when powered by the old batterybox!. I thought it was a production msitake and called Lego, but they confirmed that when you want to use the receivers you'll need to buy a new power functions batterybox. It was a design flaw they only recently discovered when playing around with the new system in the factory.

So those of you preparing to buy the new power functions system, be sure to include a batterybox, or you'll end up like me.... placing an extra order to get one afterwards. :-/


Any questions or comments are welcome, of course.

#2 User is offline   Siegfried 


  • I survived the EB upgrade and I didn't get a lousy T-Shirt

  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Root Administrator
  • Posts: 14237
  • Joined: 29-April 07
  • Member: 1554
  • Country:Australia

Posted 04 February 2008 - 01:16 PM

Thanks for posting this, but I must admit that I'm not too surprised. The recievers work the same regardless of the polarity switch position so I figured they were wired differently. You were not to know however.

(As for the price change, what can I say but >:-( . I did a S@H order while they were at the better price and I am kicking myself now.)
Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image (Siegourney in Red Moon)
Full details on the Siegfried About Me page!

#3 User is offline   Lasse D 


  • No stickers - no matter

  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Citizen
  • Posts: 496
  • Joined: 24-December 06
  • Member: 1144
  • Country:Denmark

Posted 04 February 2008 - 06:26 PM

Ouch. That is one of the design flaws that I feared. It also means that you cannot power an IR-receiver using an old 9V power supply like control center II or the widely used train pult!

I hope LEGO will issue a recall or at least change the IR-receiver so that it works as it should. And when they are at it, they might as well make use of that extra bit in the protocol for 8 channels instead of 4.
Posted Image Posted Image
Posted Image Posted Image

#4 User is offline   simonwillems 


  • Technic Campaigner

  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Counts
  • Posts: 1329
  • Joined: 08-December 06
  • Member: 1116
  • Country:The Netherlands

Posted 04 February 2008 - 08:34 PM

View PostLasse D, on Feb 4 2008, 07:26 PM, said:

Ouch. That is one of the design flaws that I feared. It also means that you cannot power an IR-receiver using an old 9V power supply like control center II or the widely used train pult!


That's right, I tried them all, train transformer, technic-6-batterybox. Well, I don't have the control center but it won't work either...

It could have been nice, hiding the small 9 volt holder somewhere in a small car. :-(

#5 User is offline   Siegfried 


  • I survived the EB upgrade and I didn't get a lousy T-Shirt

  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Root Administrator
  • Posts: 14237
  • Joined: 29-April 07
  • Member: 1554
  • Country:Australia

Posted 04 February 2008 - 09:06 PM

View PostLasse D, on Feb 5 2008, 04:26 AM, said:

And when they are at it, they might as well make use of that extra bit in the protocol for 8 channels instead of 4.

I don't think they will. From what I have heard there is too much interference as it is. I read somewhere (I can look if you want) of some people who tried to do robot soccer with four players but found only two worked well. :-/
Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image (Siegourney in Red Moon)
Full details on the Siegfried About Me page!

#6 User is offline   Holodoc 


  • Ich bin ein Berliner!

  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Eurobricks Fellows
  • Posts: 2768
  • Joined: 24-November 06
  • Member: 1094
  • Country:Germany

Posted 04 February 2008 - 09:17 PM

View PostLasse D, on Feb 4 2008, 07:26 PM, said:

Ouch. That is one of the design flaws that I feared. It also means that you cannot power an IR-receiver using an old 9V power supply like control center II or the widely used train pult!

???
Please help me: I donīt see the point in using a "mobile" IR-receiver with a "stationary" 9V pult! 8-|
What are you trying to build? *wacko*

I do agree on the older small 9V-box, though.

#7 User is offline   simonwillems 


  • Technic Campaigner

  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Counts
  • Posts: 1329
  • Joined: 08-December 06
  • Member: 1116
  • Country:The Netherlands

Posted 04 February 2008 - 09:47 PM

View PostHolodoc, on Feb 4 2008, 10:17 PM, said:

???
Please help me: I donīt see the point in using a "mobile" IR-receiver with a "stationary" 9V pult! 8-|
What are you trying to build? *wacko*


Well, if you want to make a remote controlled railwaycrossing, remote controlled train traffic lights and remote controlled points, you can do all that with two receivers connected to a transformer, put it on maximum and sit back and enjoy the scene holding a small device in your hand that is not strangling your entire layout with cables.... *sweet*

Hope this helps ;-)

#8 User is offline   Captain Blue Hair 


  • Pooped himself

  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Global Moderator
  • Posts: 4625
  • Joined: 26-August 07
  • Member: 1914
  • Country:Netherlands

Posted 04 February 2008 - 10:49 PM

Thanks for pointing that out Simon, i'm planning on some of those for the switches too *sweet*



Why do you need TLC to make sets for you, all you really need is parts...be creative!

Build a frigate!

New members please read the guidelines.
If you have any trouble in posting, deeplinking etc, please consult our
tutorials
, or the help section.

My Brickshelf. My Flickr

#9 User is offline   Lasse D 


  • No stickers - no matter

  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Citizen
  • Posts: 496
  • Joined: 24-December 06
  • Member: 1144
  • Country:Denmark

Posted 05 February 2008 - 10:56 AM

I have an idea. Instead of short circuiting certain pins in order to avoid this problem, what about adding an empty PF-battery box to the circuit?

Old 9V -> PF-cable -> Empty PF battery box (turned on) -> PF IR-receiver.

I have forgotten my own PF-cables, so can anyone try this out?
Posted Image Posted Image
Posted Image Posted Image

#10 User is offline   simonwillems 


  • Technic Campaigner

  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Counts
  • Posts: 1329
  • Joined: 08-December 06
  • Member: 1116
  • Country:The Netherlands

Posted 05 February 2008 - 11:13 AM

View PostLasse D, on Feb 5 2008, 11:56 AM, said:

Old 9V -> PF-cable -> Empty PF battery box (turned on) -> PF IR-receiver.

I have forgotten my own PF-cables, so can anyone try this out?


That might work, but it goes past the idea of saving space while using the old 9 volt battery box, because now there are two battery boxes... In that case it's better to just use the new one.

What I forgot to mention is that is is possible to make the system work with the old battery box when you connect the batterybox with one of the outputs of the receiver instead of using the cable attached to it. This only leaves you with one output left to control remotely instead of two. Not really that handy, but if you only want to control one function it might be sufficient.

#11 User is offline   Lasse D 


  • No stickers - no matter

  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Citizen
  • Posts: 496
  • Joined: 24-December 06
  • Member: 1144
  • Country:Denmark

Posted 05 February 2008 - 06:01 PM

I see the space problem, but I'm more interested in using power from outlets instead of batteries. My plan is to introduce user interaction with the PF system to layouts, such as GBC, but also in ordinary train layouts.

To let the audience control small (and secured) parts of a GBC-layout might make them even more interesting.

I still have to work on the "how to give the audience PF-controllers" and "have all in on the idea"-parts :-)
Posted Image Posted Image
Posted Image Posted Image

#12 User is offline   EyesOnly 


  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Citizen
  • Posts: 112
  • Joined: 06-August 07
  • Member: 1867
  • Country:Sweden

Posted 05 February 2008 - 07:26 PM

That sounds like i great idea. I haven't gotten any converters yet so i can't test it.

#13 User is offline   Mark Bellis 


  • PaB price investigator

  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Citizen
  • Posts: 344
  • Joined: 17-August 06
  • Member: 910
  • Country:England

Posted 06 February 2008 - 06:01 PM

The lead mod required to power a PF IR receiver from a 9V source is the bottom left one in this diagram.

A good way to do it is to use single 12V plugs on the cut wires, so you can swap the connections at will.

Mark
Mark J E Bellis - 8mm Scale LEGO Railways, Scenery and Technic. Visit My Brickshelf
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image

#14 User is offline   Parax 


  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Vassals
  • Posts: 58
  • Joined: 08-February 08
  • Member: 2699
  • Country:Nottingham UK

Posted 08 February 2008 - 10:05 PM

I think Lego ougt to have released a 2x2 converter block wihout a wire...

PF on top and old 9v on the bottom and just done normal cables...

they could have done:
a red block 9v -> PF 9v&0v lines (power into PF system)
a blue block 9v -> PF C1&C2 lines (motor convertor block)


P.

This post has been edited by Parax: 08 February 2008 - 10:09 PM


#15 User is offline   Lasse D 


  • No stickers - no matter

  • Icon
  • Group: Eurobricks Citizen
  • Posts: 496
  • Joined: 24-December 06
  • Member: 1144
  • Country:Denmark

Posted 18 February 2008 - 12:07 AM

View PostEyesOnly, on Feb 5 2008, 08:26 PM, said:

That sounds like i great idea. I haven't gotten any converters yet so i can't test it.


I have finally been able to test it and the results are...

It works! *y*

You have to turn the battery box n to the "right" side and voilā: A PF-receiver powered by an old 9V power source without use of non-LEGO parts.


PF-receiver ----- PF-battery box (turned on) ----- Adapter cable ----- Legacy 9V power supply.
Posted Image Posted Image
Posted Image Posted Image

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users