IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Power Functions trouble, ...buying power functions? Read this!
simonwillems
post Feb 4 2008, 01:02 PM
Post #1


Technic Campaigner

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Counts
Posts: 1313
Joined: 8-December 06
From: Amsterdam
Member No.: 1116



Hello there,

As we all know Lego brought the Power Functions, as used in the big 8275 bulldozer, on the market as servicepacks on Shop at Home, so now you can buy all components separately (they also increased the price shortly after, but that's a different story...).

All the components used in the buldozer are there, but also an extension wire to connect the old 9 volt system to the new power functions system.

Recently I bought some power functions: motor, receivers, remote and extension wires. I already had the old system which uses this kind of battery box and I thought that with the new extension wires one could use this (to save space inside the MOC) to power the system. Consequently I did not buy a new batterybox.

Here's the problem: the motor works fine with the extensionwire leading directly to the old battery box without using the receivers, but the receivers do not work when powered by the old batterybox!. I thought it was a production msitake and called Lego, but they confirmed that when you want to use the receivers you'll need to buy a new power functions batterybox. It was a design flaw they only recently discovered when playing around with the new system in the factory.

So those of you preparing to buy the new power functions system, be sure to include a batterybox, or you'll end up like me.... placing an extra order to get one afterwards. sceptic.gif


Any questions or comments are welcome, of course.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siegfried
post Feb 4 2008, 01:16 PM
Post #2


Now with 80% more vague Navy references!

Group Icon

Group: Root Administrator
Posts: 11754
Joined: 29-April 07
From: Over the strait and far away
Member No.: 1554



Thanks for posting this, but I must admit that I'm not too surprised. The recievers work the same regardless of the polarity switch position so I figured they were wired differently. You were not to know however.

(As for the price change, what can I say but angry.gif . I did a S@H order while they were at the better price and I am kicking myself now.)


--------------------

(Siegourney in Red Moon)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lasse D
post Feb 4 2008, 06:26 PM
Post #3


No stickers - no matter

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Citizen
Posts: 478
Joined: 24-December 06
From: Denmark
Member No.: 1144



Ouch. That is one of the design flaws that I feared. It also means that you cannot power an IR-receiver using an old 9V power supply like control center II or the widely used train pult!

I hope LEGO will issue a recall or at least change the IR-receiver so that it works as it should. And when they are at it, they might as well make use of that extra bit in the protocol for 8 channels instead of 4.


--------------------

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
simonwillems
post Feb 4 2008, 08:34 PM
Post #4


Technic Campaigner

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Counts
Posts: 1313
Joined: 8-December 06
From: Amsterdam
Member No.: 1116



QUOTE (Lasse D @ Feb 4 2008, 07:26 PM) *
Ouch. That is one of the design flaws that I feared. It also means that you cannot power an IR-receiver using an old 9V power supply like control center II or the widely used train pult!


That's right, I tried them all, train transformer, technic-6-batterybox. Well, I don't have the control center but it won't work either...

It could have been nice, hiding the small 9 volt holder somewhere in a small car. sad.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Siegfried
post Feb 4 2008, 09:06 PM
Post #5


Now with 80% more vague Navy references!

Group Icon

Group: Root Administrator
Posts: 11754
Joined: 29-April 07
From: Over the strait and far away
Member No.: 1554



QUOTE (Lasse D @ Feb 5 2008, 04:26 AM) *
And when they are at it, they might as well make use of that extra bit in the protocol for 8 channels instead of 4.

I don't think they will. From what I have heard there is too much interference as it is. I read somewhere (I can look if you want) of some people who tried to do robot soccer with four players but found only two worked well. sceptic.gif


--------------------

(Siegourney in Red Moon)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Holodoc
post Feb 4 2008, 09:17 PM
Post #6


Ich bin ein Berliner!

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Fellows
Posts: 2392
Joined: 24-November 06
From: sickbay, section 15 alpha
Member No.: 1094



QUOTE (Lasse D @ Feb 4 2008, 07:26 PM) *
Ouch. That is one of the design flaws that I feared. It also means that you cannot power an IR-receiver using an old 9V power supply like control center II or the widely used train pult!

???
Please help me: I donīt see the point in using a "mobile" IR-receiver with a "stationary" 9V pult! look.gif
What are you trying to build? wacko.gif

I do agree on the older small 9V-box, though.


--------------------

Join the campaign today! Feel free to copy and paste this sig.

days until Eurobricks' event 2010!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
simonwillems
post Feb 4 2008, 09:47 PM
Post #7


Technic Campaigner

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Counts
Posts: 1313
Joined: 8-December 06
From: Amsterdam
Member No.: 1116



QUOTE (Holodoc @ Feb 4 2008, 10:17 PM) *
???
Please help me: I donīt see the point in using a "mobile" IR-receiver with a "stationary" 9V pult! look.gif
What are you trying to build? wacko.gif


Well, if you want to make a remote controlled railwaycrossing, remote controlled train traffic lights and remote controlled points, you can do all that with two receivers connected to a transformer, put it on maximum and sit back and enjoy the scene holding a small device in your hand that is not strangling your entire layout with cables.... satisfied.gif

Hope this helps blink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Captain Green Ha...
post Feb 4 2008, 10:49 PM
Post #8


Thank you for the new avatar!

Group Icon

Group: Global Moderator
Posts: 4336
Joined: 26-August 07
From: The road, i own it!
Member No.: 1914



Thanks for pointing that out Simon, i'm planning on some of those for the switches too satisfied.gif


--------------------



Why do you need TLC to make sets for you, all you really need is parts...be creative!

Build a frigate!

New members please read the guidelines.
If you have any trouble in posting, deeplinking etc, please consult our
tutorials
, or the help section.

My Brickshelf. My Flickr
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lasse D
post Feb 5 2008, 10:56 AM
Post #9


No stickers - no matter

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Citizen
Posts: 478
Joined: 24-December 06
From: Denmark
Member No.: 1144



I have an idea. Instead of short circuiting certain pins in order to avoid this problem, what about adding an empty PF-battery box to the circuit?

Old 9V -> PF-cable -> Empty PF battery box (turned on) -> PF IR-receiver.

I have forgotten my own PF-cables, so can anyone try this out?


--------------------

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
simonwillems
post Feb 5 2008, 11:13 AM
Post #10


Technic Campaigner

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Counts
Posts: 1313
Joined: 8-December 06
From: Amsterdam
Member No.: 1116



QUOTE (Lasse D @ Feb 5 2008, 11:56 AM) *
Old 9V -> PF-cable -> Empty PF battery box (turned on) -> PF IR-receiver.

I have forgotten my own PF-cables, so can anyone try this out?


That might work, but it goes past the idea of saving space while using the old 9 volt battery box, because now there are two battery boxes... In that case it's better to just use the new one.

What I forgot to mention is that is is possible to make the system work with the old battery box when you connect the batterybox with one of the outputs of the receiver instead of using the cable attached to it. This only leaves you with one output left to control remotely instead of two. Not really that handy, but if you only want to control one function it might be sufficient.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lasse D
post Feb 5 2008, 06:01 PM
Post #11


No stickers - no matter

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Citizen
Posts: 478
Joined: 24-December 06
From: Denmark
Member No.: 1144



I see the space problem, but I'm more interested in using power from outlets instead of batteries. My plan is to introduce user interaction with the PF system to layouts, such as GBC, but also in ordinary train layouts.

To let the audience control small (and secured) parts of a GBC-layout might make them even more interesting.

I still have to work on the "how to give the audience PF-controllers" and "have all in on the idea"-parts classic.gif


--------------------

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
EyesOnly
post Feb 5 2008, 07:26 PM
Post #12




Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Citizen
Posts: 112
Joined: 6-August 07
From: Sweden
Member No.: 1867



That sounds like i great idea. I haven't gotten any converters yet so i can't test it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mark Bellis
post Feb 6 2008, 06:01 PM
Post #13


PaB price investigator

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Citizen
Posts: 268
Joined: 17-August 06
From: Derby, England
Member No.: 910



The lead mod required to power a PF IR receiver from a 9V source is the bottom left one in this diagram.

A good way to do it is to use single 12V plugs on the cut wires, so you can swap the connections at will.

Mark


--------------------
Mark J E Bellis - 8mm Scale LEGO Railways, Scenery and Technic. Visit My Brickshelf
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Parax
post Feb 8 2008, 10:05 PM
Post #14




Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Vassals
Posts: 42
Joined: 8-February 08
Member No.: 2699



I think Lego ougt to have released a 2x2 converter block wihout a wire...

PF on top and old 9v on the bottom and just done normal cables...

they could have done:
a red block 9v -> PF 9v&0v lines (power into PF system)
a blue block 9v -> PF C1&C2 lines (motor convertor block)


P.

This post has been edited by Parax: Feb 8 2008, 10:09 PM


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lasse D
post Feb 18 2008, 12:07 AM
Post #15


No stickers - no matter

Group Icon

Group: Eurobricks Citizen
Posts: 478
Joined: 24-December 06
From: Denmark
Member No.: 1144



QUOTE (EyesOnly @ Feb 5 2008, 08:26 PM) *
That sounds like i great idea. I haven't gotten any converters yet so i can't test it.


I have finally been able to test it and the results are...

It works! thumbup.gif

You have to turn the battery box n to the "right" side and voilā: A PF-receiver powered by an old 9V power source without use of non-LEGO parts.


PF-receiver ----- PF-battery box (turned on) ----- Adapter cable ----- Legacy 9V power supply.


--------------------

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th February 2010 - 03:01 AM
>  Sponsored Links